How do you feel about the removal of deadly exploration missions?

lmfgunnut

All of the details are not known yet, how do you feel about No Man's Land without danger?

masmith93

Long Live Deadly Missions!

So we're changing the name of the game I assume? If the deadlies are gone, Can't really be the walking dead anymore. Roaming Zombie's: no man's land?

JVC_TWD

As long as we can still get higher chances of finding gear there then it's all good with me. I hope they just got rid of the deadly and made it a regular mission and nothing else. Unless they increased the chances of finding worthy weapons because I never find shit there lol

raida1021

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I liked the deadlies because of the better rewards it offered. I never lost a survivor because I didn't even bother to farm on deadlies. I never flee either so I never got stuck losing a survivor permanently because I fled on a deadly.

I guess we get the same types of rewards from buying the gold crates but I will miss the deadlies.

Ifyourforgive

Long Live Deadly Missions!

The Walking Injured: No Man's Land?

SlickRick

Long Live Deadly Missions!

@lmfgunnut

You know my policy on polls and that I don't do deadlies...so this is for you...you're my boy Blue!

Poppy

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I would like to see them stay but the balance was wrong.

They were no way harder than a normal mission and the increased chance whilst there you didnt generally notice it.

[Deleted User]

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I warned people about running to buy all those weapon packs. Now ngo is looking for more ways to take good weapons and good gear out of the drops. Guess they figure why give the cow away when people are willing to buy the milk? Helloooooooo! Wake up everybody you are dealing with a company not your bestie!!! Stop. Buying. Those. Packs!

Reeconn

Good Riddence!

The achievement for completing 500 deadly missions is 500 gold so i think Next Game should honour the 500 gold to anyone who is trying to get this achievement

Amiga

Good Riddence!

I didn't play those Missions
- High gas cost
- Poor rewards
- Lack of gold tickets. Was more few months back

So basically I will not miss it...

WalkerBait1

Long Live Deadly Missions!

so sad!

johnnydives

One of the best features of the game in my humble opinion.

When I first started I lost lots on deadly missions as my in game 'Memorial' will testify but then I just love the drama and the little bit of tension they bring.

That's Tension and not attention that a lot around here crave and need

NCDawgFan

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I feel sad for future players who will never feel the rush of having two of your survivors in the exit while your level 18 legendary hunter you have a fortune of XP tied up in, wresting with a level 23 walker one grid from the exit because you were a greedy, greedy farmer.

mongo911

Wow you can die while playing this game...

NextGames's, " Personal Liability Insurance Premiums " must be exorbitant...

ant

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I think this is a really bad move! It's bad enough that they already removed the deadlies in the challenges, but now this too. There should be some risk of death in a zombie game. Also, what happens to everyone (myself included) who hasn't earned there 500 gold achievement yet? Maybe we should call this the walking lame!

Governator

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I hope they decide to do Deadlies as weekend events with a guarantee of like 3 Gold and 3 Silver crates to open. It was frustrating to do a deadly mission and have 1-2 silver crates to open. Really? I stopped doing them because the risk-reward wasn't there.

johnnydives

I wonder what the original developers think about removing deadly elements?

I can hear then now discussing the following

Let's make a fantastic world class, top free app with in-app purchase game based on where players characters get killed on missions and then what we should do after we have done that is then listen to a bunch (a few at the very least) of people afterwards to see how they feel and let's change the game to take out all the bits that made it compelling and do what they want.

What a brilliant idea,, why didn't we think of that before.

IRONDee

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I'm hoping it's a temporary thing because of the reconnection issues and being unable to replace lost characters that die because of bugs. Because I do like the thrill of maybe losing a favorite character. Even if the metrics show I didn't do them often.

Tam8

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I simply cannot understand the decision^^

Has there been an explanation or sth?

Boruto

Good Riddence!

Haha I'm a minority here.
I don't play deadly anymore so I won't miss it.

Trae

Long Live Deadly Missions!

Not at all fair to those who have been working toward completion of 500 missions for the 500 gold reward!!!!

Sipher07

Long Live Deadly Missions!

If no more deadlies, then do chance of gold and silver ticket go down? Or not? Statistically speaking based on compiled data

Ergo, If gold and silver draws go down, but XP chance goes up, doesn't it cancel it out?

OneLessTitan

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I would very much like to see Deadlies carry on. From my tracking, Deadlies provide Gold/Silver crates at about twice the % of non-deadly missions...

As it stands, if only 3% of crates are Gold in Non-Deadly Missions (in my data tracking, my results are actually less than 3%), and if 5-10% of those Gold Crates are Epic/Legendary Equipment, then you have way less than a 1% chance of pulling something useful. Add that to the fact that 4 days worth of guild challenge missions result in useless Gear for higher level players. So, those players have 3 days worth of missions a week where they can try to find useful Epic/Legendary Equipment from mission crates. Removing Deadlies pretty much takes away any shot at pulling good Equipment, since actually finding a great piece of gear from an XP or Food mission is as likely as me finding a girlfriend with 3 boobs.

If they compensate by adding more gold/silver crates to higher level Guild Missions, I would be okay with that, or some way of giving a better chance at better rewards (mainly EPIC/LEG equipment) from mission crates. Perhaps reducing the % of Rare Equipment from Gold Crates, and adding that % to Epic/Legendary Drops would do some good.

All I can say is thank goodness for Epic/Legendary TG crates, otherwise getting great Equipment in this game would be nearly impossible for the free player. Hopefully NG learned from having Lucille in the TG store, and will add more high-quality weapons to the TG store. People sure seemed to like playing Outposts a lot more when people had to save higher amounts of TGs (or maybe it was only those supposed bots based on what others have said, but saving for Lucille had to help.)

Lydia

I haven't been a regular player of the deadlies but played them on and off occasionally. I didn't really find the rewards worth the risk so personally wont miss them but not really understanding why they are being removed .. I cant see the harm in leaving them as they are and players having the choice to play them or not

Sipher07

Long Live Deadly Missions!

@eetu why not just leave deadlies as a choice in 1.9. This is very clear by the polls

Japes87

Long Live Deadly Missions!

Since there's really no risk of losing survivors unless you are severely hammered or paying no attention , as long as crate drops are still better than other missions , I am ok with it. I had a much bigger issue with the removal of the challenge deadlies.. I liked that part of the game and thought it made it unique.. quite the adrenalin rush at times

jt41

I need a "I don't care" option. I don't really bother with Deadlies anymore, unless I choose one on a whim. After I finished the 500, I just didn't see a point. All those Deadlies I played, and I never really saw any better rewards being given, so why risk my people that I worked so hard to find and upgrade?

thebluebox

Long Live Deadly Missions!

I am pleased they are gone from the challenges. That said, the deadly explorations and occasional ones in storyline are in keeping with the TWD universe. I would like to see them stay. Additionally, I think having a deadly put in as a 7th, optional mission that gives double stars in challenges would be a boon.

With the removal of deadlies from the game completely, there is no point in even having a memorial. The members of the "Empty Memorial Club" lose all bragging rights. Those of us that are close to having the 500 deadly achievement will never be able to get it now. I have 400+ deadlies right now and NO chance of completing that achievement before release.

I haz sad.

asdas

I accepted loosing deadly challenges, as so many were so buthurt of those.

But to me, those times when my heart skipped few beats when I've stayed farming and let that walker get to my survivor starting strugle... Those moments defined the best moments of TWD. That time I couldn't play for 5 days waiting for maintenance reset after épic fail trying to save my first legendary...

Don't know if I care about The Walking Might Need a Bandage....

SpacemanSpiff

Good Riddence!

Ehhh, not important to me, but since it's clearly important to others, I have no problems if they kept/reinstate it.

For real adrenaline rush, imagine if every challenge/mission/Raid was a deadly. Crazy! That would give the feeling of living in apocalyptic uncertainty. Whereas, currently, I go through most of this safe game like this....

TheLostOnes

Long Live Deadly Missions!

Out of principle, I think it needs to be possible to die in a game that's all about lethal combat. It just seems wrong otherwise.

I will also miss the higher chance of gold tickets, but we'll see what the update will bring to balance that.