Rules clarification re: spam & derailment

Comments

• Dale Member Posts: 1,122

  May 2016

  Maybe that thread was toxic? I could see how threats could be considered toxic.

  0
• _wendy_ Member Posts: 171

  May 2016

  I read the "fix it or we riot" thread. It wasn't toxic to me. I thought it was very entertaining. Js

  

  5
• ant Member Posts: 547

  May 2016

  Entertainment is forbidden!

  Click here to join the BlackjacknBeef/Asylum Family.
  
  Click here to see my youtube strategy videos.

  

  10
• Perdtin Member Posts: 783

  May 2016

  @masmith93 I think we were having fun and do not think we were spamming. On every board I have been on, threads do weave and touch different things. There are some threads, like @SlickRick one on the changes which really is more of a straightforward discussion thing.
  
  Part of the fun of boards is being able to enjoy discussions. I personally do not want to spam or troll. Don't get my kicks from that. But being a bit goofy when the situation presents itself and in context where appropriate, guilty as charged. This recent stuff has given things a bit of a chilling effect for sure.

  

  10
• SlickRick Posts: 2,731

  May 2016

  I'm very straightforward

  You better check yo self before you wreck yo self...cuz I'm bad for your health, I come real stealth
  

  0
• jester Member Posts: 2,741

  May 2016

  +1 @Perdtin

  0
• masmith93 Member Posts: 3,512

  May 2016

  @Perdtin I agree, but clearly it is not our opinion that counts (If only ). Since we've seen a lot of recently bannings, I don't think it's fair of the admin and mods to issue blanket statements without specific examples of things we need to avoid.
  
  In the thread that was closed, there was no important information, no one was being toxic, and frankly, it was all good fun. Unlike some threads we've seen recently.
  
  In the thread you started (Brooklyn) a mod warned 'us' all that we would be banned for not staying on topic. Then reconsidered, edited his post and moved the thread.
  
  So again, I ask for clarification, so everyone can play by the same rules and there is no confusion or subjectiveness.
  

  Proud member of the Empty Memorial Club.
  WHMGTYSNNBC - Retirement Guild Leader
  Coming soon to Finland to hug Teeceezy.
  This space intentionally left blank.

  

  6
• mongo911 Member Posts: 939

  May 2016

  # 1. The Mods are " new to moderating " and it shows...
  ( I've been communicating on Internet Boards for more than 30 years...)
  # 2. The Mods are dealing with Language differences and Cultural References that are not always understandable...
  ( such as, " the dreaded, I triple dog dare ya... " )
  # 3. Some people are more interesting than others...
  ( the " Board Members " usually themselves, protect the Board... And protect the innocent... )

  I am easily confused by other people's, laziness and sloppiness and greed...
  
  Any guess who might " now " be on my list, ( in 2017 )
  
  
  
  
  

  0
• Neil_J Member Posts: 1,873

  May 2016

  I think the mods are aware of the sense of humour that exists amongst regular posters, and with a jot of initiative should realise the difference between jokes, irony and spam!

  “You never know how strong you are until being strong is your only option.” (Bob Marley)

  

  1
• mongo911 Member Posts: 939

  May 2016 edited May 2016

  @Neil_J...
  
  A lot of times, it comes down to " Fear of Mayhem " thus, the fallback position of " RULES "
  
  It's hard to trust the " Anonymous Unwashed Masses "...

  I am easily confused by other people's, laziness and sloppiness and greed...
  
  Any guess who might " now " be on my list, ( in 2017 )
  
  
  
  
  

  0