At the risk of getting banned....
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/1a0fe25aed4fec99dd529ab95a669be0_50.png)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 2,344
At the risk of getting banned I really am curious as to just how does someone infract someone else? It sounds like something that would be thoroughly painful, highly humiliating and completely de-humanizing. How am I the only one that is asking for clarification here...I feel like I would need medical intervention in order to reverse the side effects of being "Infracted" and I'm the only one bring this up? How are we suppose to follow orders and be obedient when we don't even understand them?
4
Comments
--> Do you need a guild? ...send me a Private Message. My Recruiting den and my "Art Objects" in the Next Games Collection.
WHMGTYSNNBC - Retirement Guild Leader
Coming soon to Finland to hug Teeceezy.
This space intentionally left blank.
--> Do you need a guild? ...send me a Private Message. My Recruiting den and my "Art Objects" in the Next Games Collection.
Click on the red "infract" in the original post it leads to the definition. It's an action that should lead to punishment or censure not the punishment or censure it's self unless we are going to get a big red I stamped across our profile pic's or something.
WHMGTYSNNBC - Retirement Guild Leader
Coming soon to Finland to hug Teeceezy.
This space intentionally left blank.
But glad to say...
no one was underage... No animals were injured...
Any guess who might " now " be on my list, ( in 2017 )
would make more sense if we were to be extracted...it just doesn't sound legal to infract someone. Like maybe the constitution can get invoked in order to protect us from it or something lol. Or maybe counter-acted, distracted, impacted?
"given an infraction" is not really possible either. You can mark someones record with a mark that represents the infraction that has been committed but you can not infract someone or give them an infraction because an infraction must be enacted or committed. And for some around here it is more like persecuted.
At least in the USA they do this a lot. (I capitalized it on purpose in my 9:33 pm comment)
I suspect the issue here is a less than precise translation.
That is a much better wording choice and happens very often here. Or maybe even "contracted"
I just think that it would be more helpful (especially considering the fact that this is an international forum and the orginator of that post is in a position of authority) and lead to less misunderstandings if moderators made statements that were more clear, precise and definitive while establishing boundaries for forum etiquette and threatening an entire community of forum users.
That is the exact same grammatical use of the word as my example LMAO!
Yeah I guess you are right, but I have seen too many Law and Order reruns for that term to look correct IMO in any other fashion other than exactly how I typed it
Errr... Naah... He probably wouldn't answer...
We're having more fun playing with words... Carry on...
Any guess who might " now " be on my list, ( in 2017 )
True. But things don't always translate across cultures. There is also the problem that language, especially English, is very fluid and the meaning of words can morph over the years. Sometimes we all need to give each other a little slack.
He has been given plenty of "slack" way more slack than he gives in return.
Not too many people, can prove me wrong...
Any guess who might " now " be on my list, ( in 2017 )